No Chuck, No Synanon – For Better or Worse

“In my reading assorted “Synanon” writing, aside from the names noted above, he has been referred to by the more disparaging sobriquets: Chuckles and Fat Charlie.” Cordelia Becker

“Chuck often referred to himself in grandiose terms, like herd of one elephant, Capo, and the like. It was all part of what he called “sociometry” by which he meant the process of setting himself, or someone else up to be a leader, someone who would be respected and obeyed. Part of the process always involved getting the best housing, best food, best table, best vehicle, etc. This was used for facility directors, department heads, and of course, for Chuck himself.” George Farnsworth

“No Chuck, no Synanon. Where would the ideas, the excitement of ” newness” come from. Who could make learning anything, worth while, to those of us that were dead inside, who hated the thought of changing and didn’t give in to anyone. I’m a dopefiend. I didn’t learn, that wasn’t my style. That Chuck guy, just something about him that made me listen. He gave me a chance to see a way out of shame and anger about the life I had lived. I learned  persistence and how to hang tough. I really do believe, without Chuck and his ability to get through to me, without me kicking and yelling all the way. I couldn’t have done it.” Danny Anderson

“I recall Chuck’s first wife who was in Tomales Bay at the time (Dede’s mom) warned us early on. She said “Chuck will destroy Synanon. That is his pattern. His whole life everything that he did that was good he destroyed.” That was her opinion.” Ron Cook

Yes, Chuck got his insight from his trip with LSD 25. You don’t get that kind of vision from kissing a bottle of Thunderbird. He developed his charisma with people from a couple of years of stage time while in Alcoholics Anonymous. Being a cross between P.T. Barnum and W.C. Fields and having read “The Prince” by Niccolo Machiavelli and Adolpho’s “Mein Kampf” he was armed and ready for his mission in life. After finding a library book by Ralph Waldo Emerson on the Big Blue Santa Monica bus and rutting around in a dumpster behind a Chinese restaurant for some discarded fortune cookies containing thoughts of wisdom, he took the door off a storefront in Ocean Park and sitting on the cornerstone of his yet to-be-built Pyramid, and………….waited. Bob Whiteside

“Without Chuck, none of us would be having this conversation at all. I know; a lot of other people did an awful lot too, and without guys like Wilbur, Ted, Dan, Franky, Joe, Reid, etc., Synanon would not have been the same. But this is not about any of them. This is about the dynamic that created and launched an idea. Chuck was, after all, human. Though many of us, myself included, somewhat deified the old man, he was as flawed as the rest of us. He was what he was, plus what we wanted him to be for each of us.” Bob Adler

“On more then one occasion I heard the Old Man say one of these days I’ll come up with something that will run everybody out the door. We always thought it was a joke. Perhaps he was ‘kidding on the square’” Bruce Tobman

“Why do we continue to refer to that psychopath by the familiar and affectionate “Chuck,” like he was our buddy or something rather than the guy who tried to enslave us and rip us off? And who did.” Dave Gerstel

“That is the question, isn’t it? I call it, “The Cult Never Leaves You.” Many are still under his spell. I find myself slipping under it now and again, but less and less these days. I know what you mean about trying to describe the compromising. I had to peel layers and layers off my shell to finally acknowledge the hurt and humiliation I suffered, unburying emotions that I ignored while there.” Thank you for all your thoughtful writing pieces.” Janet Dart

“We were a special group listening to a guy drone on and on about electricity. I kept nodding my head and trying to focus on his face as if I knew what he was talking about. So did everyone else. Our attention was riveted on this discourse. Apparently. Chuck wandered into the room and sat down. He listened for a while. When the speaker asked for questions none of us had any. I did not want to ask anything because I figured everybody else understood and I was the only lame in the group. Chuck asked him questions. Many questions. I learned that Chuck was no different from me. He didn’t know what this guy was talking about but he was able to humble himself and ask the right questions (Why should he care about electricity? After-all you turn it on and get light or you don’t?). Because he cared about everything. He was just wanting to know things.” Dayla Thill

“Chuck was no hero. He was a “highly successful businessman” who exploited us like slave labor. While he and his spoiled, arrogant kin and cronies lived in mansions waited on by hordes of servants, many of us lived in bunkhouses with 300 sharing a communal bathroom with no partitions between the toilet stalls. All the while we were babbling mandatorily that we lived in utopia. Hero my Ass.” Gary Jones

“The first time I ran into Chuck, I was just turning a tight corner in TB’s kitchen. Face to face, not a foot apart. He seemed to me such an outlandish figure. Less than a foot in front of me, with his contorted, unpleasant, twitching facial features and his dead eye boring a hole through me…his huge hairy body draped with silly overalls, red socks, and slipper-like footwear stood the man I had heard so much about. I’d been in Synanon for about two months. I Had never seen the man close up. I could feel how aware and bright the man was. No mistake there. And right away, he knew the terrible thoughts … thinking about how gross this sudden meeting in the TB kitchen was for me. He could read it in my eyes, I was sure. I understood he would tear me apart in front of all those people for my unkind thoughts. I was ready to split right then and there. Instead, I reached out my hand, said it’s really nice to finally meet you, and we shook hands. He started asking some friendly questions. We chatted a bit and parted. By then, he looked nothing like the bulk of the unholy. He looked like a guy who had lost some nerve endings because of a stroke and was overweight. Not really very scary at all…to me.” Danny Anderson

“Before Chuck left, I sat with him at Think Table one morning. He was back on his meds and open about his bipolar disorder: “You know I built Synanon in a manic fury for the first 20 years.  After it peaked, I became depressed. I brought it crashing down all around me.” Elena Broslovsky

“I felt protective of the man who had changed my life for the better and whose vision I held dear. My time around Chuck and Betty informed the best of who I am. My sense of having free will, my stance of gratitude, my desire to connect with others, to be inclusive, open-minded, and curious.” Elena Broslovsky

“I don’t think people’s sense of gratitude is misguided – but maybe it makes them cut him more slack then he deserved, I don’t know. After all, he did start the place and deserves that credit, even if other things transpired later. I know Betty was pretty rough on him in private, as I heard her tell him one day “oh shut up you old drunk!” Oops, I was embarrassed (no, not in front of the kids!). No problem if you have no affection for the old dude, that sort of thing has to be earned or not. But I think it’s realistic to give him whatever credit is due for being the founder of our only refuge.” Ben Parks

“I lived at Tomales Bay from 1968 to 1973 and had ample chance to see Chuck in person. As for Chuck’s “wisdom”, he seemed inanely full of himself. I listened to hundreds of hours of tapes of early Synanon Games and meetings. All I heard was a loudmouthed, overbearing idiot browbeating a bunch of scared addicts. Since leaving Synanon I have had taken over 10 years of college courses including enrichment courses while teaching the physical sciences and have travelled to over 80 countries. Comparatively the intellectual atmosphere fostered by Chuck was vacuous and verbose.” Gary Jones

“I know that a lot of you people love Chuck Dederich. I’m not sure why – is it some misguided sense of gratitude or what – I just can’t really understand. I personally had absolutely NO affection for that man. Another thing – I’ve never once heard anybody mention how rude – how disrespectful – how terribly Chuck used to speak to Betty D in front of other people. Even the squares were discussing it right in front of me during one of their trips.” Anne Lombardo

“Synanon gave me a strength that I never knew I had and perhaps that is why, when my wife passed away I did not go out and get loaded. I do not want to remember Synanon as some of the people have described and yet I have an unyielding curiosity to know. Well I guess there will be a lot of questions that cannot be fully understood or answered. I pray for the man as I know we shared the same pain. God Bless Synanon And god bless Charles E. Diedrich, for the place — he has been a part of my personal history.” John DeGaglia

“He had asked the group that he was talking to at the time if they were loyal to him or to Synanon, to a man/woman they all answered, TO HIM. His reply was, “haven’t you learned anything at all — it is to Synanon that you must be loyal first“. To me that makes sense but also to me it seems he did not practice what he preached.” John DeGaglia

“I loved the man, he made incredible sacrifices for all of us. The shame is that others do not respect him for what he did and forgive him for the very same weaknesses that we all demonstrate on a daily basis. If you appreciate anything that you received at Synanon then you must be thankful to him for it was truly all his doing…strengths and weaknesses. I always feel so defensive towards him as I see too much of the criticism coming from those that do not seem to appreciate the benefits they received because of his largeness.” Ron Cook

“The things that Chuck was very good at pointing out were the ways in which we had of demonstrated our “lack of awareness, encapsulation, and tunnel vision,” Chuck taught us that we had a “need for immediate gratification” because we never learned to grow up. (I have since discovered information that suggests it is not so simply explained.) But at the time, it seemed to me there was a great deal of truth to be found in this philosophy.” “Ann Lombardo

“Some people’s resentment about Chuck is the reason I have very little to with former residents of Synanon. The people who are the most angry at our dead founder are the folks who sucked the hardest on his ass while he was alive. I have always viewed Chuck as my greatest teacher. Nothing more…nothing less. I never saw Chuck as a God or my daddy… just a great teacher.” Bruce Keller

He was charismatic, he was funny, he was bright, he was involved. His instincts were unbelievable, in that when he made a suggestion to someone as to how they had lived their lives or how they should change their lives, it was an almost egoless suggestion, which was new to me. He was really involved with other people and operating from a position of moral ascendency. I fell in love. Harold Benjamin

“The contract with the Old Man’s infallibility was built into the fabric of the society. It was for me a very painful but important lesson about confusing the message with the messenger. Norman Johnson

“In Synanon I sat in a stew with Chuck for three days. It was one of the most awesome experiences in my life, one I will never forget. To sit all this time participating with The Old Man as he taught and gamed was like watching an artist paint. His face and dead eye did not give away a thing. He was composed and articulate and made you think.” Anon

(Chuck said)…“Why don’t you get the fuck out of here?” …”The second before he said that, I was positive that I would live in Synanon for the rest of my life. The minute, the second, the microsecond the end of that phrase got out of his mouth, I was gone. It was over. I got up, and I said, “I think that’s exactly what I’m going to do.”…”Chuck… “made it possible for me to become mensch enough to do it under the proper circumstances. I really believe that to be true.”…”He banged me into a corner, and I left, and it was all over, and I have never looked back.’ Harold Benjamin

12 responses to “No Chuck, No Synanon – For Better or Worse”

  1. Another thought provoking post, Cory.

    I was surprised at the intensity of the denunciation of Dederich by certain persons whom beforehand I had heard speak only with pride of their Synanon participation.

    Since you quoted me I would like to mention that I use the name “Charles Dederich” rather than “Chuck” because “Chuck” has too much endearment embedded in it. “Charles Dederich.” for me at least, places. the man more at a distance so that I can size him up as a historical figure when I think about Synanon.
    That said, occasionally he does come to mind as “Chuck” because we shared some good times together — primarily when I was a so called “special representative” putting the live-in Synanon population on the Cube. I wrote reports for “Chuck” about my endeavors and they served as jumping off points for some long and fun conversations.
    When I think of the man as “Chuck,” it is with a bit of empathy. He was a viscous and cruel sociopath, a bully, and a braggart. But he was also a severely damaged man saddled with the depression that fuels alcoholism; and for that reason I have some regret flavored sympathy for him and when that kicks in I even feel a bit of nostalgia tinged affection. Then I can shake my head and think “Chuck, you poor demented asshole” and wish there had been someone in Synanon strong enough to put him out to pasture, probably about the mid-60’s before he made the colossal blunder of ending graduation.

    BTW: The claim that “without Chuck there would have been no Synanon” is dubious. Dederich was not the sole founder of Synanon. There were several people who galvanized the grouping that became Synanon; and we don’t know who among them was the prime initiator of the move to the Venice storefront where the intentional recovery community that became known as “Synanon” set itself up. All we really know for sure about the early development of Synanon is that without Dederich, had another of the early leaders won the battle for control, Synanon would have been a very different Synanon.

    That perspective is, for me, reinforced by an experience I had some years ago. I sponsored a friend who had severe drug addiction problems in a recovery community named Duffy’s. Duffy himself was strikingly like Dederich. Huge belly, wore overalls, spellbinding speaker — even more riveting than Dederich. And like Dederich his own recovery had begun in AA. Like Dederich, once sober, he plunged into the building of a recovery community for alcoholics and drug addicts (just about the same time Synanon was getting started). Unlike Dederich, he preached the AA concept of a higher power. Unlike Dederich, he did not attempt to enshrine himself as the highest power. Also unlike Dederich, he stayed sober till his death. And also unlike Dederich he did not end graduation and attempt to hold people for endless service to his organization but rather supported people in graduation as they attempted to build independent lives for themselves. Had different people won the battle for control in the community that became Synanon, maybe it would have become more like Duffy’s. In other words, without Dederich there may very well have been an intentional community of recovering addicts but one with a very different flavor, culture, and future.

    Cheers,
    David Gerstel

  2. Good job! Great collection. Wonderful mix. Many of this gang are deeper thinkers than I had them pegged for.

  3. Oh, Cory. What a great collection. Taken together, it shows the enigma of Synanon and why it is so hard to describe. I am unable to separate Synanon from Chuck/Charles/CED, perhaps because in my eight years of Synanon I only was in a room with him once (a Stew I jumped into to confront him about being moved to Santa Monica). That lasted 5 minutes, and he didn’t even speak to me.

    1. Janet, one of the things that comes through in your writing was the dreadful amount of peer pressure we experienced in Synanon. Sometimes I think the peer pressure was harder to stand up against than anything coming from Chuck. I am taking a leap with this but I feel like square women (good girls) were the most victimized by this. Anyway, I’m glad to know you now, and I appreciate your support and efforts in helping me with this site. I look forward to your next post.

      1. Indeed – peer pressure and the desire to belong. And yes, I am enjoying working with you on this site.

    2. Janet, he didn’t even speak to you? What a surprise! He, no doubt, had not the faintest clue who you were or why and when you were headed to Santa Monica. Were you so naive then that you thought he personally scheduled every residential and job assignment in the community? If you were, I don’t blame you a bit. He was the figurehead-in-charge who left the mundane administration to others.

      1. Jackie, I don’t think we ever met. Maybe we were in Synanon at different times. Whatever the case, I’d like to suggest that Dederich’s declining to speak to Janet may have had nothing to do with whether or not he knew her. By the time of the Stew she describes, Dederich had behind him the Root Beer moment. Another Synanon member, as you may recall, who he knew only remotely if at all also had the temerity to go after him in a Game. He dumped a can of Root Beer on her head, and that did not work out so well for him.
        So he developed another tactic for fending off community members who wanted to game him. He let one or another of his most devoted acolytes step in front of him and turn the Game on his critic while he just watched the action. In Janet’s case the acolyte was Dorothy.
        I had an experience similar to Janet’s. After Dederich began asserting that Synanon was his “nice little family business” in violation of his commitment to never use Synanon for personal gain, I was enraged and attacked him in a show Game at the Ranch. Immediately, several of his most servile minions. — Dorothy, Garrett, Sorkin, et al — tried to shout me down. I blew them off, telling them that they were suckers, fools, sycophants and so on and kept at Dederich, hard. He simply gestured to Bettye and led her out of the Game. And it was certainly not because he did not know me that he declined to respond, for by that time we had shared hundreds of hours of Games and conversation.
        Janet got similar treatment. Dederich had learned to ignore or step away from indictments rather than confront them and let “the process” protect him.
        I think Janet deserves admiration for trying to game Dederich. The policies he put into play regarding child rearing and childbirth were downright cruel. To this day, parents who were separated from their children mourn their loss. Janet was one of the few people who spoke up against the policies. Bravo for her effort then and her remarkable honesty about herself in the memoir she has given us here.
        Footnote: Years after my ineffective attempt to game Dederich in that show game, I ran into Dorothy in a bookshop in Marin County. She said (I quote from memory but with accuracy I am pretty sure) ”The hard thing about you for us (by “us” I think she meant herself and her fellow minions in the executive suite) was that you were so much younger than us and you were right. We should have known better.” I might have been right but I was also too young and inexperienced and powerless to effectively impede Dederich. I just wish Dorothy and the other full grown adults in Synanon who did have savvy and power had acted and put Dederich out to a comfortable pasture. The place we all helped to build might have gone on to serve good purposes rather than crumbling. But they were mesmerized by him and liked having their “asses on the leather” which he doled out to them.

      2. Jackie – I just read David’s response and I think he is dead on. I certainly didn’t (and don’t) associate myself with Lillian Fisher (who was the recipient of the root beer), but I was so angry about the forced move that I decided to appeal to the top. Chuck definitely knew about the Breeders – he had given his blessing to our group. He even wrote me a letter when I had a miscarriage. Yes, the sycophants and minions took over. All I knew was that Dorothy shut me down, and the Stew moved on.

  4. Thanks Cory,
    You’re doing a great thing with Morning Meeting and all formats and subjects are relevant when presented in context. I was an expert on “The Old Man” from the second week that I entered Synanon. He was the funniest guy in the pack and the sharpest knife in the drawer. How did I figure that out as someone who didn’t even have a clue as to where all the bathrooms were and what my Tribe leader’s name would be? As soon as I had freedom of movement and time. which in those days was very early on, I had headphones on my head listening to what would be some of the most amazing banter between adults that I had ever heard – and “The Old Man”, C.E.D., Chuck, Fat Charlie…whatever you wanted to call him, reigned supreme in most verbal extravaganza’s committed to tape. It was just that simple and I might add, entertaining at the time. I listened to hours and hours and more hours of tape as this new found celluloid soap opera of the place I was now living, was openly available to anyone who wanted a taste of the verbal history of the man, the people and the place in which they resided. I did, and I nerded up on it through a vicarious exchange of my dope-fiend T.V. habits with tape library listening around the good ol’ round table in the living room of my new home directly above the Santa Monica Crash Pad.
    On tape, he was sometimes jocular and whimsical but always commanding and the nature of the immediate universe was at the center of wherever he sat for as long as I lived in his house. Those tapes were a god send for me and as I got more familiar with The Game and Synanon in general. Life was more about the people than about any one person. I had lived in Synanon for three years before I lived even close to the same facility that “The Old Man” lived in. When I rotated to the Bay properties as part of the Breeders was the first time that I lived in proximity and we really got close when I was taking a piss in the bathroom across from the Barn 2 dining room at the Ranch and he used the urinal next to me. We never exchanged words. In fact, over the course of my more than six years, I don’t think that I ever spoke to Chuck…like most people I would guess. I extend kudos to anyone that was ever in a Game with him and had to suffer through the purgatory of actually being Gamed. Those execs that were in the hot seat on a regular basis carried a heavy load for a lot of the spectators. The place was set up like a Roman circus and Chuck “Caesar” Dederich was in command.
    My memories are good and respectful because I do believe that he saved my life and even through the turbulent times of the eighties, he was still a part of the family that provided a home that helped raise my son, Rahshan. Through the years I have come to realize that there was so much more going on than what was apparent but it was always that way on many levels, from top to bottom. I just happened to be lucky enough to stumble into a dynamic place at the right time in my life and rode the wave that Chuck had created twelve years before. He was the right man for the time as history has borne out.

  5. Gary – my only disagreement with you is: ” Those execs that were in the hot seat on a regular basis carried a heavy load for a lot of the spectators.”

    In my opinion, those execs did not take the hot seat for us, they kowtowed to him. Anyone who stood up to him in the “hot seat” was sent running. When I was there, that left him surrounded by Dorothy and Dan Garrett, Ron Cook, Dan Sorkin, and CED’s kids. (And others I can’t think of right now). I personally watched Sorkin change from a down-to-earth kinda guy (he was in my first Game in the summer of 1969) to mean. I wouldn’t even call him a true believer; he was more drawn to CED’s power.

    In “The Tunnel Back,” Yablonski (quoting sociologist Max Weber) described CED’s power as “charismatic leadership.” He continues: “The charismatic leader depends on emotional appeal and personal magnetism for his power. He controls through an almost magical force of personality…. Charismatic leaders function in a highly personal manner, and their subordinates derive almost all their power and authority from the leader.”

  6. Janet – the problem was that you “Squares” needed as much therapy as the dope fiends and considered the Games as such – therapeutic sessions, while what needed to happen was all out of the Game stuff on a number of difficult levels. After all, we are all human. + It is difficult to retrospectively do woulda, coulda, shoulda’s on past endeavors because there is a blanket assumption that everyone did the best that they could under the circumstances that life dealt them but Weber’s quote is a cogent one and the “Old Man” was as close as I have ever come to living with someone with unbridled power. When I have been incarcerated, that was a situation somewhat similar in terms of living and being subject to a mass acceptance of 24/7 environmental demands and strictures, as was the military but Synanon was so different in so many ways due to the juxtaposition of free passage into another world of reality at any conceivable moment that you so chose to walk away from the universe of Chuck’s own making. EVERYONE lived with that and the layer of accountability at its highest and most powerful, was also the most susceptible to having the comforts of a successful life, eviscerated through open rebellion. One thing that was true to the very core of the process was that there was no subtlety to opinion and beliefs so there was really nothing to do once the voice of the Game could lead to retribution…but leave.

  7. So fascinating and compelling to read all these experiences and perspectives of my dad — so wise and well written. All true. (From my perspective and experience) and I guess that’s a lesson about the human condition for sure. as my friend, Phyllis Olin once said to me, “we’ll be deconstructing our S experience for the rest of our lives.” Sometimes that fact is a bit dismaying and sometimes enlivening.

Leave a Reply

POST TYPES
YEAR

Discover more from It's Time for Morning Meeting

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading